Midjourney bans fake images From Justin Brown.
An American artist who creates offensive images depicting politicians in compromising situations defends himself against accusations, declaring his willingness to fight the irresponsible and potentially dangerous use of generative AI. The images in question are part of a series called by Brown himself “AI will revolutionize the blackmail industry‘.
>> Want to learn how to use artificial intelligence in your marketing strategy? Discover the AI Marketing course and take advantage of the SUMMER PROMOTION: up to 25% off the new Ninja catalog until August 20<
According to Brown, the intent that Midjourney probably didn’t catch was to demonstrate how easy it is to use artificial intelligence to help spread fake news and therefore blackmail people with completely false ones.
In this ideological dispute, the well-known platform took a clear position and decided to block the artist’s account.
An episode that raises questions about the ethical implications of using AI, especially in light of the US presidential election scheduled for 2024.
Find out why together Midjourney bans fake images and the Justin Brown case.
READ ALSO: What are the best AI image generators
Midjourney Bans Fake Images: Justin Brown Case
OUR false created by Brown in Midjourney, features various political figures, including some candidates in the 2024 US presidential election.
Joe Biden is on the podium with former President Donald Trump, former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.
These artfully crafted images depict U.S. politics in racy scenes: the artist is essentially trying to catch the country’s most prominent figures red-handed, in a completely fictionalized way.
An action that Midjourney considered dangerous as it could undermine the honor of candidates in an election. The gesture is considered disgusting because it is harmful to American democracy and to all the democracies of the world.
middle of the road ban fake images of Justin Brown only after he posted incriminating photos on third-party sites – Reddit and Twitter – given the nature of the two platforms and the wide range of image transmission.
Midjourney Bans Fake Images: Ban Doesn’t Stop Offensive Images From Spreading
Although Midjourney has been on the run from Brown’s ravages, images are still circulating online. The ban essentially prevents the same account from creating images, but does not prevent the distribution of those already created.
Brown himself in an interview with PetaPixel notes how “the series became known on Reddit, although it was deleted seconds after the news of the Midjourney ban.”
An incredible move for the author of a controversial gesture that he believes should actually spark reflection on the issue of fake news. In fact, Brown claims he has been the subject of block requests in the past for offensive words and controversial numbers, but he has never been blocked for his creativity.
Midjourney bans fake images: Brown’s revolution against AI
In Brown’s PetaPixel story, his distaste for the “reckless” use ofGenerative AI. The goal of the artist, as he repeatedly stated, is to draw public attention to disinformation fueled by artificial intelligence.
The equation for Brown is simple: “When used wisely and deliberately, AI can be a weapon.”
This is the thread he posted on Twitter on the day of the Midjourney ban news.
“AI images or videos,” Brown continues, “used at the right moment, can bring down the market, cause a riot, or force someone to walk into a pizzeria with a gun.”
And if it’s true, as he claims it was an ecumenical attempt to evangelize the masses, then the images must certainly pose a threat. The only way to succeed in the experiment was to focus on people of power placed in compromising contexts.
Justin Brown banned from Midjourney sparks debate and controversy
The artist claims via Twitter that photos don’t have to be great quality to be credible. As the offending photographs themselves show, the powerful figures are in fact depicted in blurry scenarios.
Thus, Brown claims the plausibility underlying the completely false and baseless images.
And that is why the same, reasoning, says that he would prefer not to be banned, and at the same time recognizes the need to hold accountable those who are ready to produce malicious content using generative AI.
Brown’s controversy doesn’t end there: the artist states, with disappointment, that the images were removed after a few months, which is too late compared to the collapse of the trust that could be associated with the characters depicted in the painting. false images.
READ ALSO: The Creative and Transformative Power of Artificial Intelligence
What are the scenarios for generative AI and what are the possible implications?
A fascinating yet controversial application of generative AI. A topic that has caused and will continue to cause discussion, especially regarding the ethical implications and possible harm of digital art.
The case that sparked the discussion actually concerns the creation of realistic images of old people. dead famous people to understand what they would be like today if they were alive.
The use of these images without the consent of the deceased may seem disrespectful to some, and a worthy way to honor the legacy of these famous personalities to others.
Brown’s irreverence is fueling debate today about the use of images for both political and commercial purposes, perhaps through the use of images of now-deceased characters that sponsor products. Completely plausible scenarios.
In fact, it is no coincidence that after the Brown case, many countries decided to discuss the possibility of launching it. laws and regulations on labeling photos created with artificial intelligence. And it’s not at all obvious that the Vatican was the first to recently publish a handbook on AI ethics.
READ ALSO: Biases and Prejudices: What is the Risk of Learning AI in Humans