21.2 C
New York
Friday, September 24, 2021

Buy now

Brad Pitt does not give up and returns to the charge for his children






After five years of fighting for the custody of her children, Brad Pitt and Angelina continue on the warpath. Oscar winner for Éonce upon a time in hollywood He has just asked the Superior Court of California to review his child custody agreement after the court set aside the judge who was handling the case, who was the one who last May granted him joint custody of the five of his six children still minors: Pax, Zahara, Shiloh, Knox and Vivienne “Maddox, 19, is no longer part of the process.” Brad Pitt does not give up and has returned to the charge requesting through his lawyers a review before the Supreme Court of California after hehe disqualification of Judge John Ouderkirk will effectively vacate the joint custody judgment, according People.

Brad PittVIEW GALLERY

A California appeals court disqualified Ouderkirk in July, claiming that Jolie was right that the judge did not disclose her business relationships with one of Pitt’s attorneys in a sufficiently clear manner. Fact that led him to be removed from the case for lack of impartiality. “Judge Ouderkirk’s ethical violation, taken in conjunction with the information released about his recent professional relationships with Pitt’s attorney, could cause an objective person, aware of all the facts, to have a reasonable doubt about his ability to be impartial. Disqualification required “ruled the California Second District Court of Appeals.

-The new reason that has faced Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt (and they are not their children)

It is not clear at the moment what business Ouderkirk is involved in with Pitt’s lawyers, but the magistrate when he made his decision on the custody agreement did not allow the children of the ex-partner to testify, despite the fact that three of them wanted to lend their statement before the judge. Earlier this year, Jolie submitted several documents alleging that the judge refused to listen to the evidence that she believed was essential to the case, including the testimonies of her children. “Judge Ouderkirk denied Ms. Jolie a fair trial, improperly excluding her relevant arguments for the health, safety and well-being of the children,” Angelina’s legal team alleged about the magistrate who at the time officiated the marriage of the children. actors at the Château Miraval, in France.

Angelina Jolie and VivienneVIEW GALLERY




In Pitt’s application, attorneys state that Not only did the decision to remove the judge upended his own dispute, but it could complicate custody decisions in other cases for California’s overburdened court system. “All of this is likely to create uncertainty for the parties, who may see major rulings such as custody agreements undone on weak grounds for disqualification, even after years of litigation.”

In turn, they alleged that Jolie “learned of Judge Ouderkirk’s significant professional history with Pitt’s attorney early on,” but he did not seek his removal until years later. “After more than four years of contentious litigation, each day of which the children and their father have been harmed, an important and considerate custody decision will be completely overturned as a result of clerical error that has nothing to do with the merits of the custody dispute itself, “the attorneys said. Pitt’s attorney, Theodore J. Boutrous Jr., said they are seeking” a review in the California Supreme Court. , because the temporary judge, that had been repeatedly appointed and renewed by both parties, was improperly disqualified after providing a detailed, fact-based custody decision, after a lengthy legal process with multiple witnesses and experts. “

Brad Pitt with his son KnoxVIEW GALLERY

Anyway, the California Supreme Court will have the last wordBut it is not clear when he will make the decision on whether or not to accept Pitt’s appeal request. The interpreter of Once upon a time in hollywood He already showed his indignation after the judge who had granted him joint custody on a provisional basis was removed. “The facts have not changed. There is an extraordinary body of evidence that led the judge and the experts who testified to reach a clear conclusion about what was in the best interests of the children. We will continue to do what is legally necessary based on what is best for children. “it said through its spokesperson. Pitt’s attorneys say this was Angelina Jolie’s tactic to delay the custody change from taking effect.

Click to see Brad Pitt’s documentary, his monographic chapter of the Stars series. You can see more in the new video platform HELLO! PLAY, where you will find cooking programs, fashion, decoration and biographical documentaries of ‘royals’ and ‘celebrities’. Do not miss it!

Loading the player …






HELEN HERNANDEZ
Helen Hernandez is our best writer. Helen writes about social news and celebrity gossip. She loves watching movies since childhood. Email: [email protected] Phone : +1 281-333-2229

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Stay Connected

0FansLike
2,955FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe

Latest Articles