Chile and Venezuela: different messages

Sunday has seen two momentous elections.

Today 07:27

By Atilio A. Boron
For Page 12

On Venezuela, the normal performance and the presence of almost all the fragments of the opposition constitutes an extraordinary success for the Bolivarian government, as well as a stumbling block difficult to digest for the coup leaders and destabilizers protected by Washington and the reactionary bureaucrats of the European Union. On chili, it was expected that the second round would have as protagonists neo-Nazi José Antonio Kast, of the Republican Party already Gabriel boric, the candidate of the Coalition I Approve Dignity (Wide Front and the Communist Party). What was not foreseeable was that the candidate of the pinochetism obtained the first relative minority, when several surveys gave Boric as the winner, although far from the absolute majority.

Unlike Venezuela, on chili the elections were called to elect the president, deputies (155) and 27 senators, in addition to the regional councilors. The scenario set at this time only allows us to make some conjectures about what could happen in the second round scheduled for December 19. Historical antecedents say that from 1990 to the present the candidates who triumphed in the first round also did so in the ballottage. If these figures are confirmed, it could be said that we are facing a real political earthquake. Not only for the victory of Kast in the first round but also because none of the three parties that have dominated Chilean political life since the end of the dictatorship: the UDI, National Renewal and Christian Democracy, will be present with their own candidates in the second round. One can, without a doubt, speak of an end of the cycle, in a context where the Chilean people are trying for the first time in their history to write a Constitution democratic in nature. The uncertainty generated by the electoral performance of the extreme right casts thick shadows on the viability of such a noble purpose.

On Venezuela this Sunday has been the 29th election since the inauguration of Hugo Chávez Frías to the presidency of the republic on February 2, 1999. Despite this, the recalcitrant opposition to the chavismo remote control from Washington and Brussels It has not stopped stigmatizing, not for a moment, the Bolivarian government as a dictatorship, comparable to those that devastated Latin America in the 1970s. How not to remember the wise words of Eduardo Galeano when he said “Hugo Chavez it’s a dictator, However, it is a curious dictator. He won eight elections in five years. ” In these regional elections, the Bolivarian government put into play, according to what the Constitution, no less than 23 Governors and 335 mayors. If the presence of the opposition is a positive figure, another very eloquent indicator will be the degree of electoral participation. It must be borne in mind that since 1984 voting was no longer mandatory due to an agreement between the two main political forces of the time: Democratic Action and Christian Democracy. A figure close to 50 percent would be greeted with joy, both in Venezuela like in chili, given the deterrent role played by the pandemic of the covid-19 and in Venezuela, the ravages of the blockade. Of course, while this country has been practically invaded by numerous electoral observation missions, with the approval of the government of Mature; sent by the European Union, the Carter Center, numerous UN experts as well as other regional organizations of Latin America and Africa, on chili these missions are conspicuous if not for their absence because of the meager number of their contingents. In any case, when the final recount of the results of the Venezuelan “mega-election” is made (if not before) criticism from the eternal custodians of democracies will rain down, trying to cloud the electoral process and justify new attacks on the Bolivarian government.

However, the verdict of the ballot box should be a powerful deterrent for those who, in Washington and Brussels, they bet for years on a criminal “regime change” in the Caribbean country. They are unlikely to adopt a different political line, because Washington is absolutely played with the “recovery” of Venezuela, At whatever price. The next few days will give us the guideline of what is to come in both countries.

Source link


Helen Hernandez is our best writer. Helen writes about social news and celebrity gossip. She loves watching movies since childhood. Email: Phone : +1 281-333-2229

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker