World

Hotesur and Los Sauces: the FIU asked the Justice to define the dismissal of CFK with an argument in favor of the vice president

File photo of the vice president of Argentina, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner.  EFE / JUAN IGNACIO RONCORONI
File photo of the vice president of Argentina, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner. EFE / JUAN IGNACIO RONCORONI

In the midst of an internal crisis, as a result of the resignation of its authorities, the Financial Information Unit (UIF) presented an opinion in the Hotesur / Los Sauces case to ask the Federal Oral Court 5 to respond to Cristina Kirchner’s request for dismissal before to move forward with the cause. At the same time, and in a veiled way, the FIU winked at the defense of the vice president by stating that the crime of money laundering requires a prior sentence on the preceding crimes. It is a minority theory that has already been discussed in other trials, such as the K money route.

“In this way, the questions raised by the defenders, which make the impossibility of prosecuting the preceding offense, both due to the prohibition of double trial and the application of the principle of legality and the guarantee of nullum crimes sine lege praevia, make it unavoidable to elucidate the issue prior to judging acts of money laundering, given that, as was said at the time, the existence of a preceding crime or a prior offense, constitutes an unavoidable element for the existence of money laundering. “, supports the presentation of the FIU to which he had access Infobae.

The debate is not new. In the case of the “route of money K” was also present and the majority criterion of TOF 4 was that the law does not require a conviction for the preceding offense, but rather reaches a firm well-founded suspicion. In fact, fraud was taken into account through public works, which is judged in the cause of Roads – where Vice President Cristina Kirchner is one of the main defendants – and the tax evasion of Austral Construcciones, which is still being investigated in several cases .

“The majority interpretation is that a prior sentence of the preceding crime is not a condition. That is the criterion that was used in the route of the money K. But there is another minority interpretation that there has to be a final final judgment. Thus it would be impossible to advance in the causes of laundering “, explained an expert in the field consulted by this means.

The presentation of the FIU, which acts as the complainant, has only four pages and is signed by Leandro Ventura, a lawyer very close to the outgoing president of the FIU, Carlos Cruz, who was virtually in charge of the Litigation area, and Adolfo Tonin Monzón.

The brief maintains that the TOF 5 must respond to Cristina Kirchner’s defense proposal immediately and leaves the door open by mentioning the previous sentence of the preceding crimes. “Yes, we understand that the aforementioned circumstances, which operate as a factual and legal context, make it advisable to take extreme precautions when continuing with the judicial proceedings, in those cases that there are final judgments regarding the facts judged, whenever both legal security and the very pillars of the rule of law are at stake, as emanates from the prohibition of multiple criminal prosecutions. Especially in actions of institutional and social significance such as this one, in which alleged acts of public-private corruption are investigated ”, says one of the paragraphs.

Two weeks ago, despite the fact that expertises requested by the same defenses were being carried out, the lawyers of the vice president and her children, the nation’s deputy Máximo Kirchner, and Florencia Kirchner, They requested his dismissal in Los Sauces / Hotesur. The Kirchners’ lawyer, Alberto Beraldi, also requested the dismissal of Romina de los Ángeles Mercado, daughter of the governor of Santa Cruz Alicia Kirchner, and her brother-in-law Patricio Pereyra Arandia, two other defendants in the case.

Daniel Obligado president of TOF 5. (Photo NA: Leonardo Zavattaro)
Daniel Obligado president of TOF 5. (Photo NA: Leonardo Zavattaro)

The case investigates an alleged money laundering and illicit association on the part of the companies Hotesur and Los Sauces – of the Kirchner family – in the rental of their hotels and properties to businessmen. The imputation is that they rented as consideration for the public works that their companies received during the governments of Néstor and Cristina Kirchner.

Now the opinion of the federal prosecutor is awaited Diego Velasco, He has a deadline to comment until tomorrow at 9:30. With that, the TOF 5 judges, Daniel Obligado, Adriana Palliotti and Adrián Grünberg, They will be able to respond to the presentation of the Kirchners.

Times are pressing because Grünberg will leave that court in two weeks.

However, any decision made by the court will be reviewed by Chamber I of the Cassation Chamber, which dismissed the vice president for the cause of the future dollar and the memorandum with Iran.

KEEP READING

Manzur meets with Insaurralde and suburban mayors who also requested interns for 2023
Boudou, Mariotto and Alicia Castro, with their own political party: “We are part of the hard core that transformed Argentina”

Source link

HELEN HERNANDEZ

Helen Hernandez is our best writer. Helen writes about social news and celebrity gossip. She loves watching movies since childhood. Email: Helen@oicanadian.com Phone : +1 281-333-2229

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker