In the line of lingerie-what’s my name?, who is accused of false advertising


When Rihanna launched her lingerie collection in 2018, began their journey with the company in the emerging accountable for the clothing line, Kate Hudson’s Fabletics.

Unfortunately they were presented with claims of deceptive tactics in the collection, both against the Fabletics company and the emerging TechStyle Fashion Group, and it is now on the line, what’s my name?, Some of the x-Fenty, is facing criticisms similar to.

Many have praised the line for its advertising models, with varying body types and races. Unfortunately, on the 11th of January, the non-profit organization, Truth in Advertising, said that Some of the x-Fenty “misled consumers into accepting charges monthly, which, in reality, they do not want”, through a plan for the affiliation is hard to deny. The organization said it had alerted the Federal Trade Commission concerning the business practices of the line, which, in its opinion, are in breach of the rules of the organisation and the Law on the Restoration of the Confidence of the online Shoppers (SCREW, for its acronym in English).

When consumers purchase products, such as bras and underwear, on the site, Some of the x-Fenty, according to Truth in Advertising, the brand is recognized for consumer subscriptions, with monthly payments of fifty dollars, ” without revealing any of the substantive provisions of the offer,”. All prices are shown when an item is added to your shopping cart to digital for the client, for example, 19,50 dollars for a pair of leggings, as they need a membership. For those who are not a member, then the price of these leggings increase to more than double that. Truth in Advertising, also said that the brand uses so-called “tactical deterrence and, as a distraction,” when consumers try to cancel their subscriptions.

Even so, the group said that more than a few influential people are in the line in which social networking sites can be misleading.

Some of the x-Fenty has denied the allegations. “Is false, based on wrong interpretations of our business”.he said in an e-mail to Emma Tully, who was the representative of the line.

In Some of the x-Fenty, we have a strong commitment to transparency inthis is the reason that we include several notices on the terms and conditions applicable to our association for the purchase in their listings and, through a policy of collaboration with the government,” he said.

The claim of Truth in Advertising, this refers to a widespread practice called “negative option billing” on-line, which consists of companies, which include a charge of a service to the consumer, unless they have rejected it specifically.

“Many of the consumers are fond of this brand, to promote women’s empowerment and inclusion, and that they do not have any issue in buying the products in this web site,” he said in an interview, ” Bonnie Patten, the executive director of Truth in Advertising. “The problem with this is that you don’t have to, of course, that the prices that you see at social networking rely on the acquisition of a company, and, because of the way in which it operates, and the process of recovery, they are enrolled in a subscription model, without knowing it,“.

When your customers have added items to the website shopping cart, it immediately adds a title from the “monthly Savage”. At the time of paying, the client must delete it explicitly with this concept, which tend to increase the price of the items.

TechStyle has obtained funding for more than half a billion dollars, and is valid in the region of one billion us dollars, according to data provider Pitchbook. Of the company, arising out of, that used to be called JustFab, and its founder was specialised in this kind of signature for years.

In 2014, with the name of Adam Goldenberg, co-founder of the company, has been included in the action brought against the Sensa, the company who was and is, the object of which is the sale of a powder is the miracle for weight loss, which resulted in false false false. The Federal Trade Commission had imposed on Sensa with a fine of nearly fifty millions of dollars, and is one of the largest implemented by the dependency, and in cases of false and misleading advertising.

TechStyle paid for 1,88 billion dollars in the same year, to settle a judgment, in respect of the protection of the consumer, which showed its brands, including for Fabletics, does not make it “clear” that your calculations required for the automatic payment of the monthly subscription fees.

Either way, Silicon Valley has been regarded as the TechStyle is a success and is expected to make an initial public offering.

Although it is possible that a consumer familiar with the business model of Some of the x-Fenty, Patten said that, Truth in Advertising, it has detected hundreds of complaints in relation to the revenue of the company and its practices is made.

c. in 2020, The New York Times Company