We continue to search for the last, only goal of the human consortium: the maximum comfortable life. Modern strike activity reaches its apogee thanks to documentaries. An hour and a half of a crash course on everything from pharmaceutical companies to murders and you know you have an idea for something. They are bignam for fracomodi, even more fracomodi. You turn on Netflix and dig deeper there. Soon they will also finish in installments, in front of the TV, the main thing is that the fetus is passive and there is a sofa under our terrible ass. Among the various documentaries reflecting the point of view is a film recently released last year about Depp and Heard’s trial, which ended in victory for self-proclaimed Johnny. What are we talking about? Evident. How would we take another step towards the foundation of the degradation of civil society. Namely, we live in an age of summary justice on social media. That’s what I thought last year, before doing a better review, thinking about it better, putting together parts of the same story, but better.
We continue to search for the last, only goal of the human consortium: the maximum comfortable life. Modern strike activity reaches its apogee thanks to documentaries. An hour and a half of a crash course on everything from pharmaceutical companies to murders and you know you have an idea for something. They are bignam for fracomodi, even more fracomodi. You turn on Netflix and dig deeper there. Soon they will also finish in installments, in front of the TV, the main thing is that the fetus is passive and there is a sofa under our terrible ass. Among the various documentaries reflecting the point of view is a film recently released last year about Depp and Heard’s trial, which ended in victory for self-proclaimed Johnny. What are we talking about? Evident. How would we take another step towards the foundation of the degradation of civil society. Namely, we live in an age of summary justice on social media. That’s what I thought last year, before doing a better review, thinking about it better, putting together parts of the same story, but better.
Depp vs Heard tries to weigh in on one crazy variable: the role of social media in court, the so-called embarrassing questions about how Internet traffic outside the courtroom could affect the verdict. Director Alice Cooper is very ready, her hands forward.. He argues that the purpose of the documentary is not to take sides, but to carefully fit all the information into a single story and consider how certain opinions were formed. We have already heard the propaganda of documentary neutrality, it’s a pity that we are stupid viewers, but up to a certain point: a narrative track, if you don’t sleep on it, on this sofa, you can’t hide it with two dry leaves. Social networks control processes! Blame them! You can follow the verdict! (in fact, this is not the case, at least not always, not systematically, otherwise with #MeToo we would have prisons filled to the attics with pigs).
What this process has decided, you should ask a good criminal defense lawyer. A lawyer who admits the truth about lawyers: very often we are of little use. Almost nothing. Those sensational speeches that you see on television are American, in our country they even irritate the judges.. What actually diverts the process in the right direction? Documents and witnesses. And when – as in the case of Depp and Heard – everything is in perfect and tragic balance? There is no doubt that these two gave and took in the same way (forgive me for the triviality of statements) and that both were, so to speak, in a difficult mental situation. Filed here for bipolar disorder, substance abuse, anger management issues, and pleasure addiction.
In such cases – a couple of unfortunate culprits, a 1 to 1 draw – what to do? Where should the judge be? What kind of fish is he catching, on which side should the scales tip? The most tender souls plug their ears: sympathy decides. Yes, exactly, I legally blasphemed. A man begins to count more than a function. In other words: how much the judge likes this or that side of the case. Or, in this case, the jury. No social networks work, the farce was not for us, but for them, these seven viewers with the right to vote.. Depp understood this and chose the role: he could do shit without doing it. Now the look of Edward Scissorhands, then the lowered head of Donnie Brasco, then the day after tomorrow the half-smile of a Caribbean pirate over a lawyer’s mistake. Always restrained, magnificent, as if it was written according to the script: do the opposite of emotions.. The angrier the question, the more it irritated politeness. He never forgot to make the Fantastic Seven laugh, but without flattery, without psychological blackmail, without calling them to compassion. In short: without any risk to the bank.
Treat the process like a movie.. Details. Forget social media for a moment. Her desperation under too well done hair and this blonde. This blond was an accurate indicator: you can’t be honest suffering from that perfect light point. With these curls, it’s impossible to believe in you, even if you’re bleeding. Always followed the jury too much. Glue your eyes. A call for sympathy with every breath. Those who have the truth in their pocket do not ask.
Work is more important than social media. And of the two, one was a bad actor and the other was not.