The daughter of Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson has decided not to give her son a royal title with Jack Brooksbank.
Experts say that Princess Eugenie has been “preparing for the end of the monarchy” in light of her recent decisions regarding her son.
This claim was made by actual author Omid Schobie, and during his interview on The HeirPod he was quoted as saying, “Unlike the name, which will be revealed in the next few days, a title for this baby may never come.”
“The main reason is due to tradition. The titles are passed on from the paternal side of the family and of course, Jack Brooksbank as a commoner makes him and Eugenie’s children commoners as well.
“What’s interesting here is that the queen, as we’ve seen in the past, has the power to turn Jack into an Earl, and then they could give their sons titles. But what we’ve seen in recent years is a trend away from titles. “
She also added: “Princess Anne pioneered this when she rejected a nobility for her first husband because she wanted to raise her children without titles. Just a couple of years ago, we saw the Sussexes choose not to give Archie a title. “
“This is an ongoing trend here with Eugenie. As the Royal Family focuses on a more streamlined model, Eugenie and Beatrice are not royalty, so the need for the title is a bit unnecessary. We’ve even seen some rejections from Wessex recently. “
He concluded by saying: “Sophie, the Countess of Wessex, told the Times in an interview that they are raising their children from a very young age to know that they have to go out into the real world and get work.
“I think it’s a healthy approach to raising children as royalty because we don’t know how long the Royal Family will be around. We are at the peak of the Windsor era with the Queen at the helm.
“But, as that changes, that can change things for everyone involved. It’s probably a smart approach, a smart move, ”he said.