a possible dream (2009) symbolized the rise with its title Sandra Bullock Just like a Hollywood star.Breaking from the rom-com mold we’re used to, the film proved to the industry that it could appeal to the masses through drama, and most importantly, that it could compete with awards season favorites such as Meryl Streep and helen mirrenand snatch Oscar Best Actress Award. Yet fourteen years after its premiere, the legacy of this work is crumbling from demand, leaving us speechless.
If you don’t recall, the movie is based on the book. Weaknesses: Evolution of the game Written by Michael Lewis, it tells the true story of Leigh Anne Tuohy and Michael Oher. Or rather, the relationship and connection between this mother and an African-American teenager who, after spending most of his life in foster care because of his mother’s drug addiction, found someone who accepted and helped him. family nucleus. His full potential in American football.
Director John Lee Hancock (a perfect world), a possible dream This is a movie about compassion and love for othersThis drama showcases Lea Anne’s dogged perseverance and the generosity with which she opened the door for Michael. Not only adopted him and welcomed him into the family, but also helped him through thick and thin with gangs, learning and reaching his full athletic potential, and even helped him call her “Mom.” However, According to Michael Orr in a legal petition, Leigh Anne and her husband never adopted him and instead had him sign a custody waiver, allegedly using his story for financial gain .
Michael Oher is 37 years old, according to different media reports, such as ESPN, 14-page petition filed in Tennessee court Claims Sean Anne Toohey and Leigh Anne Toohey never adopted him. According to him, less than three months after his 18th birthday in 2004, the couple tricked him into signing a document making them his guardians, giving them the legal authority to do business on his behalf. As Oher wrote in his 2011 book, I overcame difficulties The couple allegedly explained to him that there was no difference between adoption and custody. However, there is, because under guardianship, Oher would cede his financial power to the couple.
While this is a judicial request, and a version of the truth to be determined by a judge, there is no doubt that such relief would change the entire narrative of the acclaimed 2010 Oscar-nominated film. But most importantly, if confirmed in court, it would essentially overturn the legacy of protecting the only statuette Sandra Bullock won during this time.
because a possible dream The production focuses all its dramatic power on the protective, ferocious and overwhelming persona of Sandra Bullock’s Leigh Anne. Because while the story of overcoming adversity is not her own, the film elevates a mother’s message of empathy and generosity, symbolizing her place in Michael’s life as an important bridge in helping him reach his potential.. As such, the film has not been immune to criticism from many, who accuse it of appealing to the “white savior” stereotype and promoting Ray Anne as more about rescuing troubled African-American teenagers than Michael’s self-improvement. However, Sandra Bullock’s stellar performance belied all the negative criticism, earning her the first and only Oscar of her career, and her career took a leap in Hollywood.
True, the win was marred by the infidelity of her ex-husband Jesse James, and tabloid stories clouded her professional glory, causing her to step away from the media spotlight for a while, but time passed and her performance was never forgotten. Yet, as this new court petition emerges, the legacy of the work, and the sweeping change it brought to his career, comes with a sense of alienation from the generous idealism committed by the film and Bullock’s performance. version of.
The same petition explained that Michael discovered “the lie that disgusted and shamed him in February 2023” of the custody he had agreed to on the basis of being another member of the family, “which in fact put him in a relationship with the The Toohey family has no family ties.” To this end, the family has set up a foundation called “Making it Happen,” which aims to “protect children without care.” His list of directors includes, in addition to Michael, Tuohy core member and attorney Debbie Branan (Debbie Branan). In turn, Leigh Anne became a motivational speaker as a result of her experience with Michael.
Additionally, in the same petition, he claims that the Toohees used their protection of power to settle a settlement that paid them and their two biological children “$225,000 plus 2.5% of the net proceeds” of the film, while he Didn’t do that. He’s got nothing for the “wouldn’t exist without him” story. There was no payment of any kind,” though he said he didn’t recall signing it, or if he did, it wasn’t explained to him.
Michael asked the court to end the custody and issue an injunction preventing them from using his name and likeness. In addition, he asked the family to provide an account of the income generated in his name and to pay him his share, as well as compensatory and punitive damages.
Sean Tuohy responded to the news and assured memphis daily (pass ESPN) he was “appalled” by the allegations, adding that his family “didn’t make any money from the film” but shared in the proceeds of Michael Lewis’ book. “We’re very sad,” he said. “It’s upsetting to think we’re going to make money from any of our kids. But we’re going to love Michael at 37 as much as he was 16.”
Michael Oher has long lashed out at the film and its impact on his life.For example, in 2015, he told ESPN People began to associate his achievements with Tui’s support, rather than celebrating his own ability on the pitch. “People look at me and take things away from me for a movie. They don’t really see my skills or type. That’s why they demean me so much for off-set stuff,” he told the outlet.
However, this so-called revelation darkens the image, legacy and story told by the film, which squeezed the image of Leigh Anne’s adoptive mother on Sandra Bullock’s skin and accused her of financial exploitation , has nothing to do with empathy. A possible dream. For now, this is a judicial request, and it remains to be seen who the judge says is against whom.
This article was written by Cine54 exclusively for Yahoo en Español.
You may also be interested | video on
Zachary Levi Calls Hollywood Productions ‘Crap’
Hollywood never seemed to foresee the problems it faced after the success of ‘Barbie’
Latino public holds key to ‘blue beetle’ avoiding deadly fate
Demi Moore succumbed to role of porn myth, paid the price