he will pay the legal fees

Wedding finished? It’s all my fault Husband who doesn’t hug wife, taking refuge in a state of “affective isolationism.” For this reason, the panel of judges of the Velletri court sentenced the 37-year-old resident of Rieti, who, in addition to having to pay alimony to his wife (who is several years older than him), will also have to bear alimony. all legal costs, estimated at 7600. The couple, according to the husband, quarreled from morning to evening, which made any display of affection or physical contact impossible, but, according to the judges, “the inert attitude of the husband, who preferred to isolate himself in relation to the needs the couple does not seem to respect the responsibilities that come with marriage.”

In short, according to the judges, the man (defended by lawyer Federica De Santis) would have failed in his duty sanctioned by the marriage.

He announces his suicide to his wife and daughters and disappears into thin air, 10 years later making a shocking discovery: “He is alive, he is in Greece.”

Tiziano Ferro divorces her husband Victor, the judge makes a decision about the children: “I only think about them”

Story

The verdict was handed down in recent days, but the crisis between the two former spouses dates back five years. It all started in 2018 when a woman, in light of an ongoing family crisis, decided to seek a divorce from her husband, whom she had married four years earlier in 2014 and with whom she had no children, wanting to bring charges against him. is to blame for the breakdown of their marriage. According to the woman, in 2016, that is, two years after the official union, after being recognized as disabled, difficulties began, which resulted in a slow and constant deterioration in relations.

Again, according to the woman, “the constant and unreasonable refusals of emotional and sexual relationships, as well as the lack of any attention to the wife, made continued cohabitation intolerable.” According to the wife (defended by lawyer Emiliano Rosalia), responsibility should have been placed solely on her partner.

However, the man’s version is completely opposite. According to the thirty-seven-year-old man, “the marriage was characterized by a state of conflict due to the obsessive and oppressive behavior” of his partner, which caused “a tense family climate and which repeated quarrels led to the slow disintegration of marital life, so much so that even intimacy between the couple became impossible.”

Scenery

Therefore, in such a conflict situation, should the husband force himself to have an intimate relationship with his wife? Even if he wanted to say no, as his wife might have done in the same situation, should he have said yes? Moreover, should he show affection, pour out and try to experience moments of intimacy with his wife? For the Velletri court – yes, at least as stated in the verdict. Since “the husband’s proven and peaceful attitude towards isolation and isolationism in relation to intimate relationships and in general in relation to the wife’s repeated requests for affection, determines an unreasonable violation of marital duties, in relation to the duty of moral assistance, which involves blaming the husband for divorce.

No conflict

On the other hand, it cannot be said that the marital relationship was characterized by a high level of conflict and that there was no room for affection between the couple, as the husband claims, since married life should be characterized, as noted above, by moral assistance and mutual support.” And so forward, in sickness and in health, in joy and pain, until “isolationism” separates us.

Read the full article
on Leggo.it