Parents object, judge steps in, orders daughter to get vaccinated against hepatitis B and tuberculosis

A family judge in Rosario orders a health center in the city to vaccinate newborns be opposed to Hepatitis B and Tuberculosis (BCG), included in official vaccination programs and crucial in the first hours of life, After the mother refused vaccination. Faced with a situation that endangered the little girl’s health, A director and a doctor of the medical institution requested the judicial authorities to take personal protective measures.

a few days ago Medical professionals at a health center in the city came across a suggestion:especially during the Covid-19 pandemic, sparking heated debate and tension: anti-vaxxers, In this case, about the newborn baby.

According to judicial resolutionOn September 27, the mother of an infant refused to be vaccinated against hepatitis B and BCG to prevent tuberculosis. Incorporate into the national compulsory vaccination plan.

this Women argue that vaccination “means girls’ health may be at risk, Such as allergies.and he said he would agree “After conducting immune studies on another effector with experts”at an unspecified time.

Faced with this dilemma, The deputy director of pediatrics and the attending doctor of the hospital require personal protective measures to be taken At the Collegiate Family Court No. 7, the judge intervenedUzza Andrea Brunetti. During the presentation, they warned of the need to be vaccinated in accordance with the National Vaccination Plan and Public Health Law No. 27,491.

Deny the risk

In this sense, they also indicate that although “The parent was repeatedly informed by the health team of the risks of not vaccinating girls and the general population, but she persisted in her refusal.”

After placing an order, On September 14, the judge transferred him to the General Defender’s Office and the Medical Examiner’s Office for trial.. Additionally, the parents were ordered to appear in court and the province’s deputy minister for the promotion and protection of the rights of children, youth and families was notified.

The conclusion is The medical examiner’s office is great. Dr. Paula Keller said, “Vaccination starting at an early age can protect those who are most vulnerable to potentially serious infectious diseases.”

In this sense, it states that neonatal vaccines “include hepatitis B virus (within 12 hours of birth) and tuberculosis (BCG).”

Furthermore, he insisted “It is people’s responsibility and obligation to get vaccinated for each stage of life. To protect not just the people who receive it, but society as a whole. “

Quoting Law No. 27,491, they emphasized that the state is the one guaranteeing the vaccination schedule; “Determining that vaccines are compulsory, free and a social good.”

Life is more important than faith

On the other hand, the average defender No. 10, Alejandra Martínez believes that “every child has the right to life; In accordance with the provisions of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, as well as health issues considered in the National Constitution “The right to the highest possible level of treatment for health and illness and health rehabilitation services.”

The official added that life and health must “take precedence over the beliefs, ideas, interests and values ​​of its legal representatives”. He stressed that these beliefs belong to the parents, “not the newborn, because they don’t have the autonomy to make decisions.” There is also no ability to choose and execute actions based on beliefs or values. “

>>Read more: Anti-vaccination movement: Who is behind Rosario Sputnik fake data audio?

When solving, The judge took these opinions into account because both said the vaccine was mandatory., beyond the time that elapsed between the girl’s birth, filing of the claim and discharge from hospital. To protect the parties, the data in the document has not been disclosed.

Vaccination, effective and preventive

judge He listed public health reasons as well as provisions in the Convention on the Rights of the Child that protect the right to health of girls, boys and adolescents.

He also cited National Law No. 26,061 (On the Comprehensive Protection of the Rights of Boys, Girls and Adolescents), which states:The State must ensure access to health services, respect for family and cultural norms recognized by families and the communities to which they belong, As long as they do not pose a threat to their life and integrity. “

Brunetti too Supported by National Public Health Act No. 27,491Controlling vaccination-preventable diseases, it is understood “Vaccination is a preventive and highly effective public health strategy.”

please remember Vaccines are considered a “social welfare” but must adhere to certain principles, in particular residents are obliged to use vaccines, and “public health over private interests.”

The judge explained, “The obligation to uphold a girl’s rights above all other rights, including those of her own parents, As well as any adult. “

at last Personal protective measures were triggered and health care workers were authorized to “immediately provide hepatitis B and BCG vaccines to infants.”.and notify To parents, given their responsibilities, “it is important to avoid blocking or impeding applications vaccine, otherwise will be considered a breach of court orderwhich may result in criminal prosecution.

Value of Law27,491

Specific case consultation, lSoledad Guerrero, Provincial Immunization Program Coordinator, Appreciate these provisions, A month ago, Law No. 27,491. “It provides an opportunity for the national vaccination calendar to He is concerned about this“The obligation is missing and it’s not well understood.” the person in charge said.

“The calendar is designed to achieve social immunity, Getting vaccinated is not only about protecting yourself, but also about your responsibility to others.I’m glad the judge took the law into consideration and the case is going well“Guerrero told La Capital.

He also explained the value of vaccines Newborns with hepatitis B have a 90% risk of becoming chronically infected with hepatitis B. risking one’s life, This is why it is used within the first 12 hours of life. “

relative to BCG vaccine, which is used if the baby is exposed too early to someone who has tuberculosis or is immunocompromisedIt can also cost you your life. That’s why it’s mandatory for them to use it before leaving the delivery room. “

Finally, he said the new law gives provinces the power to develop mandatory vaccination programs and plans. “Immunization programs must develop clear strategies to reach people in a more accessible way. Likewise, when encountering an objector, it is recommended to first act by persuasion and, if unconvinced, initiate a report and, if necessary, apply a circuit to the judge. In Santa Fe, we must start implementing these strategies. “