Are we sure that what Massimo Segre did is different from what Shakira did? | Vanity Fair Italy

Let’s stop for a moment and think deeply: are we so sure that what Shakira did to Gerard Pique is less serious than what Massimo Segre did to Cristina Seimandi? The mechanism is basically the same: take revenge for your partner’s betrayals by exposing them in public in order to gain sympathy and understanding from others. We agree that dirty clothes were washed at home.but in the case of Shakira, BeyoncĂ© and Taylor Swift, the matter is different: the ability to make scams and scams payable. Just like the main characters Isle of Temptation who, hiding behind an alibi in attempts to save the relationship, understand perfectly well that there is nothing they can do. Except instead of lounging on the couch and befriending “Cioco and Lato,” Bridget Jones’s best allies, they decide to march in front of the TV in hopes that the public will follow them on social media, turning them into influencers.

Dissolution of engagement Seymandi Segre

However, what Segre did compared to what Shakira did is different: Shakira did it to increase her wealth, and Segre did it to inflate his ego. However, in both cases i always ends up in the middle.narcissism, although in different ways. Some will say that Shakira is an artist and therefore it is more than normal that she draws on her personal experiences to create music, and we agree with that. But it’s one thing to talk about your emotional state, and another to write and sing lyrics aimed at tearing down another person, knowing full well what will be unleashed once the song hits the radio and streams. In our opinion, it would be appropriate to emphasize the following: thinking about personal revenge on someone you loved, something dubious whether it happens in music or at a party celebrating a wedding that will never happen.

Sarah De Boer / ipa-agency.net

The real victims are people who may be terrible at being betrayed, but who definitely don’t deserve to deal with and face hatred. sinister and unmotivated herds of complete strangers who have no idea what really happened inside the offending couple. We listen to only one bell, we do not have a big picture: what right do we have to destroy a person about whom we know nothing, but about whom, as it seems to us, we know everything, simply by watching the frame and listening to the verse? Let’s think about this more deeply and maybe… Let’s try not to encourage such toxic and destructive views. incapable of doing good both to those who apply them and to those who tolerate them.

Source link

Leave a Comment